Audemars Piguet

Hello, all: I have wanted to buy a RO for years, and have tried on the 15300 several times, but have never pulled the trigger because the shape and stiffness of the 15300 bracelet have always made the watch ride too widely on my wrist, as you can see here...  

the thinner bracelet links, which yields the same benefit. Thus yes, I would say it wears better on smaller wrists. Anyone else? Cheers, TM

...but I have largish and wide wrists (7.5"+). I like the way both feel, but I ended up getting the 15002 (which is very close to the 15202). In truth, I bought my 15002 without ever first trying it on, but when I did slip it on, it felt absolutely perfec... 

I have the same problem that you do with the 15300... I will tell you that unfortunately, the 15202 is even worse in that respect than the 15300. The case profile is thinner... thus forcing the lugs and first link even wider apart than the 15300. In my ex...  

exactly the information I was looking for. Now I can end my search for a 15202 and begin looking again for a 14790, humble though that may be in the grand hierarchy of Royal Oaks.

Hi, CF, Please note that the picture NPDang displayed does NOT include a Jumbo, so don't draw your conclusion based on the relative curvature shown in the picture. On the other hand, I do accept his comments at face value - just goes to show that watches ... 

As far as the 15202... I agree the drape may wear differently upon different wrists. However, as far as I've noticed the first link/lug does tend to stick out slightly more than the 15300, rather than folding straight down as in the 25860. It's a shame as...  

Sincere regards Hiob This message has been edited by Hiob on 2010-03-05 05:07:21 This message has been edited by Hiob on 2010-03-05 05:11:28...