How about neither one

Apr 23, 2011,21:17 PM
 


I have seen better references of the Timewalker. But it does all come down to personal taste on individual models and unique differences Watch One I don't care for the seconds sub dial at 9 with the heavy gold border it has an unbalanced look about it. I have seen a similar reference is simple rose gold makers and it is very attractive. That one had a straight black band with no highlighted stitching
Watch twin is a nice reference but why add the gold pushers? I prefer the continued use of DLC on the pushers. Again, my taste my preference I am sure others would love these simple design changes as shown Regards Jay

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Which Timewalker Chronograph layout do you think is better?

 
 By: mkt33 : April 20th, 2011-05:38
The newly redesigned version with the stylized continuous seconds counter? Or the DLC release from SIHH 2010 with the vertical layout but a larger chronograph hour counter? Mike...  

#1

 
 By: aaronm : April 20th, 2011-08:26
I don't ever like it when chronographs make the continuous second counter tiny, the way they did it on the second one. Hamilton has a habit of it and it always irks me. I'd rather they left it out and had a 6/12 bicompax design. A

#1 is better because...

 
 By: jporos : April 20th, 2011-08:52
of the more balanced subdials. The continuous track for the seconds is not so great.

The first one

 
 By: christhistle : April 20th, 2011-10:08

#1 gets my vote

 
 By: Davo : April 20th, 2011-16:14
I'd be happy to have both, but if I were to choose one, it'd be the first. I generally prefer symmetry on watch dials.

I prefer the layout of the first one.

 
 By: NW Rain : April 21st, 2011-14:18
Everything feels more in proportion. I have seen the DLC Timewalker in the local boutique, and photographs don't do justice to the shiny DLC. I would love to see the DLC Timewalker with the layout of #1.

1st layout is more balance but boring.

 
 By: ling5hk : April 22nd, 2011-16:19
I prefer 2nd dial as it is interesting. Hour counter is bigger than the Minute counter and the Second counter is the smallest.. Mike, what is your preference? Regards Ling

#1 boring...yes I agree

 
 By: mkt33 : April 23rd, 2011-06:02
I like the second version better because I like the larger hours counter. I seldom find myself timing anything less than half an hour... My chronos only get use as a parking timer! Now with Val Fleurier's involvement, I think the movements and overall des... 

How about neither one

 
 By: Timecollector : April 23rd, 2011-21:17
I have seen better references of the Timewalker. But it does all come down to personal taste on individual models and unique differences Watch One I don't care for the seconds sub dial at 9 with the heavy gold border it has an unbalanced look about it. I ... 

#2 for me [nt]

 
 By: cazalea : April 25th, 2011-11:44
No message body