Maxi Marine Diver Chrono

Feb 29, 2008,23:20 PM
 

Interestingly, the watch itself doesn't look bad in the steel.  When I first saw the publicity photos, I was wondering what in the heck UN was thinking when they designed it.  The colors were garish and the look almost cartoonish.  Completely unsuited to UN which, among other strengths, has some of the best overall designed watches in the business. 

Handling the watch at my local retailer I was struck first with how heavy it is.  It's also a thick watch, probably more than 14mm.  This helped UN pull off the dial's 3-D effect, with hands and subdials clearly differentiated in height.  It also helped to blend the colors together in a way that was pleasing instead of corny.  I'm still not clear where this watch stands with respect to the rest of their line-up, but at least it's not anywhere near as ugly as the photos would suggest. 

Having said all that, I still think this thing is overpriced by a good thirty percent.  There's a LOT of significant competition for sport chronographs in the $10k range, not to mention the $5-$7k range where the steel version of this watch should appropriately reside.

bill

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Ulysse Nardin presents the new Maxi Marine Diver Chronograph

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : February 28th, 2008-05:56
Maxi Marine Diver Chronograph – fusion of elements The Maxi Marine Diver Chronograph embodies a fusion of the chronograph and diver collections. A rugged all weather sports diving chronograph with a self winding movement, the Maxi Marine Diver Chronograph...  

I wonder why they choose to use ETA 7750 instead of 2894

 
 By: loujo : February 28th, 2008-13:37
Not that 2894 is better. Just wonder why they did the switch. Or is it the larger version of 7750 (don't remember its name) Still don't like the look of the watch.

Maxi Marine Diver Chrono

 
 By: Bill1 : February 29th, 2008-23:20

It is the 7753 variant ...

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : March 6th, 2008-03:02