ztirual
1269
Nico
Feb 23, 2015,14:56 PM
forget about repairing silicon parts in 50 years time.
That was the point I was making.
Good traditional watchmaking, irrespectively of how complicated it is, just as Breguet's watches today, can be serviced in the future by educated, skilful watchmakers.
But those silicon (etc.) parts, when those are broken, what will you do? Fix them with glue, go to the nearby shop, use another material?
Tissot was famous for experimenting with plastic parts throughout the 60's and 70's for some key components of their movements. Can you fix those pieces today?
At an equal level of complexity I believe that in the future it will be easier to repair one of those fantastic hand made watches from independents (Smith, Dufour, Strehler, Gerber and many others come to mind...) than one of those watches with a silicium elements (and God knows what other special materials)
The former are designed with respect for the past and to last for generations, they use materials that can be repaired, sourced and be relatively easily remade in the watchmakers workshop. The latter imho much less so.
Please note for me there is less an opposition between Independents and the brands than between those sticking to more traditional material and those who don't. We know of many independents who widely or sparingly use new materials for the mobile parts of their movements. De Bethune and Laurent Ferrier come to mind. Well, needless to say that I would be much more concerned of servicing of their watch equipped with high-tech materials that I would be with a watch of say, Klings or Haldiman... It has little to do about the care that needs to be taken when servicing. That applies to all watches.
Best, my friend